Be Richest!
3
5
72
72
Typical building TM game
It's a good game. Is it great? No, but it is a good game to help pass the time. Definitely worth trying the demo and see for yourself.
August 4, 2012
If only...
the developers hadn't made it a click-fest, this would have been a fantastic game but there was just overkill with the yetis, rats, villains etc. It just ruined it.
It has all the components of a fantastic building game (much better than Build-a-Lot) and I would happily re-buy this game if they shortened the time allowed and completely got rid of the annoyances mentioned above.
August 13, 2012
Very bad
The worst game I ever had. - I regret that I bought this game. The strategy guide is also not really helpful. The later on actions to get the blueprints can't really worked out. For ex. the buildings want groceries or work - but there are all upgrades, shops etc. but nevertheless you thave to repair the buildings.
August 8, 2012
Not Entertaining!!
I am a fan of the first 2 games (Be Rich and Be Richer). This, Be Richest, is terrible. Constantly clicking to build, constantly clicking to get rid of rats, thieves, and Abominable snowmen. I mean, really, you got to have like 4 clickers to get pass a board. After the first 3 boards it is almost impossible to get gold and it don't tell you how many days it will take for you to get gold, silver, or bronze. Who ever created this game needs to be fired. This game is a serious disappointment. Don't waste your time unless you love to click on your mouse consistently.
August 12, 2012
Thought it would be more challenging?
I was hoping for more. I did absolutely hate having to click on many buildings at once rapidly to rid of criminals and rats.
The levels were too easy, but then again I play a lot of Time Management games. So maybe, I am beyond these basic games. If anyone knows of other TM games that are good please let me know!
August 6, 2012
Constant clicking required very annoying
I really enjoyed Be Rich! and Be Richer! This was definitely the weakest of the 3. Graphics are good, but a new element to the gameplay requires you to constantly click the mouse -- to build faster (req'd to meet gold status), defeat random enemies, etc. Turns out you end up clicking non-stop if you want to get gold on the level, which grows pretty annoying after a while. In fact, victory on a level had less to do with skill and strategy than it did with how long your left-mouse finger could hold out constantly clicking. Even more annoying, pop up story bubbles would appear in mid-play interrupting frantic clicking and stalling gameplay.
PRO: Interesting game concept and levels.
CONS: Stupid constant mouse click requirement was very annoying and made me bored of playing within a fairly short time.
August 11, 2012
What happened?
Be Rich and Be Richer are great games. I bought this latest release based on my enjoyment of the past two titles. Unfortunately, Be Richest has abandoned the gameplay mechanics of the past in favour of becoming a left mouse "clicking-fest". Hovering my mouse pointer over a rat, thug, fire, etc and mashing the left mouse button until the threat is removed isn't much fun, especially when it makes up 50% of the gamer's experience.
August 9, 2012
Too much left clicking to do.
I should have read some of the reviews by other players. The game basically is fun, however, the repeated need to click to boot out the rodents or photographers is annoying to the point where I have given up playing the game. I like games where one is challenged in building etc, however, would like a break from having to constantly be clicking the mouse to get results. It's hard on the muscles.
August 8, 2012
Not what I expected
I hate games wear you need a walkthough just to pass it. There's way too much going on; it's impossible to get perfect scores. One has to click too much to get things completed. This game was very disappointing.
August 6, 2012
Build-alot copy cat
The be rich series is a complete rip off of build-alot. Except for a couple of additions this is the EXACT same game. If you liked build-alot you will like this. But don't expect anything different.
August 7, 2012